As a medium, comic books have come a long way from simply being called the “funny papers.” What used to be considered disposable entertainment in the early 1900s has since evolved into a real and tangible medium for literary significance. Whether it’s deconstructive like Watchmen (by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons) or celebratory like All-Star Superman(by Grant Morrison and Frank Quitely), comic books have shown that the medium of superheroes is one that can convey powerful stories. But as the tales are released, it’s much harder for creators to leave a long-lasting impact. But there are few that have broken the mold and proven themselves, whether in the written or drawn form.
CBR VIDEO OF THE DAY
Matt Fraction is a comic writer that has worked on countless comic stories and characters. While he’s most recently known for his work on the comic series Sex Criminals, which he tackled with Chip Zdarsky, he’s also ventured into the worlds of DC and Marvel Comics. But his most outstanding work on Marvel changed multiple characters for the better. That said, what truly made these characters stand out had nothing to do with epic battles or moments but everything to do with Fraction’s unique writing style. But in bringing his brand of writing to Marvel, he also redefined how stories in the universe were told.
Matt Fraction’s Style Grounds Its Characters
Matt Fraction came onto the scene at Marvel, penning X-Men stories that helped to establish himself as a writer. But he truly let his style shine in the Immortal Iron Fist series, where he worked with Ed Brubaker and artist David Aja. From there, he began to make massive strides working on Iron Man, Thor, Fantastic Four, and his most prominent series, Hawkeye. It was actually with the characters Iron Fist, Hawkeye, and Iron Man that Fraction’s effects on the Marvel Universe were most evident. Where many writers have made their mark in world-building or high-stakes battles, Fraction used its most unlikely heroes to create grounded personalities that made them more relatable than ever.
Even though Iron Fist was street-level, he was either a kung-fu master or a laid-back hero to readers. But Fraction proved that there didn’t need to be a separation. The conflict in a man who lives such an adventurous life became a major focus of his characterization and brought a new vulnerability to the character. On the other hand, Iron Man has always been a larger-than-life hero that few could relate to personally. But with his run on Invincible Iron Man (by Matt Fraction and Salvador Larroca), audiences were treated to a version of Tony that embraced his mistakes and flaws. That said, it wasn’t until Hawkeye (by Fraction and David Aja)that Fraction proved how his style could work, as it wasn’t a tale with high stakes but a slice-of-life story that focused on an Avenger that never got the attention he deserved. It brought a level of humanity to the character that helped make him more beloved than ever.
Matt Fraction’s Style Redefined Marvel Superheroes
It’s been some time since Matt Fraction has written for Marvel, but his impact has remained and served as a foundation for other great writers to be inspired by. What has made his work such a standout in the genre has been that he showcases the grounded side of some of Marvel’s largest and smallest heroes. Whether it’s Hawkeye or Iron Man, these private moments that older stories wouldn’t have focused on showed that these heroes aren’t as different from one another as they may think. For example, in Hawkeye, Clint is often shown using amazing marksmanship but returns home to relax before more problems come to face him. In many ways, it mirrors real life and the few moments people have to relax.
By embracing this grounded approach to storytelling, writers have allowed fans to get more into the head of their favorite characters and understand their routines. But what has made this direction work with other characters and how Fraction showed a new side to its characters without sacrificing the action or habits that make these heroes great. In essence, Iron Fist can still be an adventurer and Iron Man a jet-setting superhero, but now readers know that they also wonder about if they’ll get a callback or left the oven on. It’s a disarming approach but one that has redefined Marvel Comics for years to come.
Herschel Walker said erection live on TV, a defensive lineman from Pitt had a very big reaction during Saturday’s game against Miami, a defensive back for the Alabama Crimson Tide is named Kool-Aid McKinstry, President Biden spent his Thanksgiving in Nantucket, Trump met with Kanye West and White Supremacist/Holocaust denier Nick Fuentes for dinner and spent the following days distancing and defending himself, Kanye asked Donald to be his VP and he is mixing up with all the worst people in the world, and Jimmy and Guillermo go undercover as Santa’s helpers in a new Naughty or Nice.
SUBSCRIBE to get the latest #Kimmel: http://bit.ly/JKLSubscribe
Visit the Jimmy Kimmel Live Website : http://bit.ly/JKLWebsite
Like Jimmy Kimmel on Facebook: http://bit.ly/KimmelFB
Like Jimmy Kimmel Live on Facebook: http://bit.ly/JKLFacebook
Follow @JimmyKimmel on Twitter: http://bit.ly/KimmelTW
Follow Jimmy Kimmel Live on Twitter: http://bit.ly/JKLTwitter
Follow Jimmy Kimmel Live on Instagram: http://bit.ly/JKLInstagram
About Jimmy Kimmel Live:
Jimmy Kimmel serves as host and executive producer of Emmy®-nominated “Jimmy Kimmel Live!,” ABC’s late-night talk show. “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” is well known for its huge viral video successes, with over 15 billion views and more than 18 million subscribers on the show’s YouTube channel. Some of Kimmel’s most popular comedy bits include “Celebrities Read Mean Tweets,” “Lie Witness News,” “Unnecessary Censorship,” “Halloween Candy YouTube Challenge,” and music videos like “I (Wanna) Channing All Over Your Tatum.”
The List Price is the suggested retail price of a product as provided by a manufacturer, supplier, or seller. Amazon will only display a List Price if the product was purchased by customers on Amazon or offered by other retailers at or above the List Price in the past 90 days.
All prices include VAT.
What is Cash on Delivery?
Cash on Delivery (COD) payment method allows you to pay by cash at your doorstep for fulfilled by Amazon and some seller fulfilled items. You will not see the Cash on Delivery as an available payment method on check out If you have at least one condition that is incompatible with cash on delivery eligibility.
Return reason
Return period
Return policy
Wrong or missing item, Defective, Any other reason, Physical Damage
15 days from delivery
Full refund or replacement
Return Instructions
Keep the item in its original condition, with brand outer box, brand/price tags attached, user manual, warranty cards, CDs and original accessories in manufacturer packaging for a successful return pick-up. If the item(s) is delivered by a seller directly, you need to ship the item(s) back to the seller within 10 days from the date your return is requested.
Amazon directly manages delivery for this product. Order delivery tracking to your doorstep is available.
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Find out more
What is Cash on Delivery?
Cash on Delivery (COD) payment method allows you to pay by cash at your doorstep for fulfilled by Amazon and some seller fulfilled items. You will not see the Cash on Delivery as an available payment method on check out If you have at least one condition that is incompatible with cash on delivery eligibility.
Return reason
Return period
Return policy
Any other reason, Wrong or missing item, Defective, Physical Damage
15 days from delivery
Full refund or replacement
Return Instructions
Keep the item in its original condition, with brand outer box, brand/price tags attached, user manual, warranty cards, CDs and original accessories in manufacturer packaging for a successful return pick-up. If the item(s) is delivered by a seller directly, you need to ship the item(s) back to the seller within 10 days from the date your return is requested.
Amazon directly manages delivery for this product. Order delivery tracking to your doorstep is available.
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Find out more
Available at a lower price from other sellers that may not offer free Prime shipping.
VERSATILE – 60 Minutes of adjustable timer for cooking versatility with 7 presets that allows you to cook with little or no oil for low-calorie, low-fat meals perfect to fry, bake, grill, and roast
SAFE – Detachable lock with protective cover for preventing basket from dropping with auto-off for added operational safety and a Cool-touch housing for handling convenience
EASY TO CLEAN – Dishwasher safe parts for cleaning convenience
Special offers and product promotions
Product information
Brand
Black & Decker
Model Number
AF625-B5
Color
Black
Product Dimensions
37 x 37 x 41.6 cm; 6.22 Kilograms
Capacity
5.6 Liters
Power / Wattage
1800 watts
Item Weight
6.22 kg
Frequently bought together
To see our price, add these items to your cart.
Choose items to buy together.
This item: BLACK+DECKER 5.6L/1.5Kg 1800W XL Digital Air Fryer For Frying, Grilling, Broiling, Roasting, and Baking / مقلاة اهوائية BLACK + DECKER 5.6L/1.5Kg XL للقلي والشوي والشواء والتحميص والخبز
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Top reviews
Top reviews from United Arab Emirates
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Reviewed in the United Arab Emirates on 12 October 2022
Style: 5.6 LitersVerified Purchase
Better for your time good cooking. Food was delicious, healthy . I didn’t feel stomachache from fried food as usual Minimal oil use. I’d recommend that item.
Reviewed in the United Arab Emirates on 23 July 2021
Style: 5.8 LitersVerified Purchase
Awesome fryier, since got it I stopped using oven. You can cook anything you want!
Reviewed in the United Arab Emirates on 24 August 2021
Style: 5.8 LitersVerified Purchase
Great quality product fit for the job, ample capacity and the brush finish makes it looks amazing
Reviewed in the United Arab Emirates on 18 August 2021
Style: 5.8 LitersVerified Purchase
Reviewed in the United Arab Emirates on 26 October 2022
We are a big family with this air fryer my cooking is made very easy. I feel it’s reasonably priced and high capacity which helps homemakers to cook large quantities in one go.
Reviewed in the United Arab Emirates on 6 October 2022
Style: 5.6 LitersVerified Purchase
Reviewed in the United Arab Emirates on 8 April 2021
Amazing product, good for fine cooking, perfect for healthy family.
5.0 out of 5 stars
حلوة جدا
Reviewed in Egypt on 25 March 2022
Style: 5.8 LitersVerified Purchase
عجبني حجمها وتسويتها للاكل وسهولة استخدامها ولكن لم يعجبني ان سعرها زاد 1500 جنيه بين يوم وليلة ومش عارفة اكلم مين عشان اخد فاتورة ضريبيةلتفعيل الضملن
4.0 out of 5 stars
المنتج جميل جدا لكن جالى من غير فاتورة عاوزة فاتورة
Reviewed in Egypt on 4 January 2022
Style: 5.8 LitersVerified Purchase
المفيد للتجارة المنتج جالى بدون فاتورة من فضلك عاوزة فاتورة لتفعيل الضمان من فضلك
BUNTE.de – Das Beste aus der Welt der Stars & Royals! Bleibe immer up-to-date mit den frischesten News: Finde heraus, wie die Stars & Promis leben, lass dich von den märchenhaften Bildern der Royals verzaubern, entdecke neue Fashion- & Beauty-Trends und die besten Tipps für Gesundheit, Familie und Beziehung.
Impressum:
Burda Forward
St.-Martin-Straße 66
81541 München
Environmental crime thrives across the Amazon as a result of low state resilience. Some efforts have been made to combat it. However, corruption, a lack of political will, and limited articulation between public agencies form an explosive mixture that has resulted in soaring deforestation.
Legislative Framework
Each of our countries of study has its own legislative framework designed to protect the environment. However, contradictions, ambiguities, and legal gaps mean that these often fall short of combating environmental crime.
In Bolivia, a number of laws are in place to target environmental crime. However, legal gaps and contradictions mean that perpetrators are rarely punished.
The Law of Mother Earth and Integral Development for Living Well in Law 300 of 2012 lays out the government’s commitment to protecting the environment and promoting sustainable living. This has been the legal basis of norms used to regulate the management of natural resources across the nation, including water and hydrocarbons. However, alongside this, successive governments have promoted expansive agricultural activities and cattle rearing, which are often linked to land grabbing. This raises questions about how effective the law has been in curbing environmental crime.
Otherwise, the nation’s penal code outlines penalties for a number of environmental crimes. Article 358 states that anybody who destroys forests, jungles, pastures, or crops should receive a prison sentence of between one to six years. Article 206 details that anybody who creates a fire to make way for agriculture (that spreads and damages other properties) faces two to four years of imprisonment. Fires continue to incinerate Bolivia’s Amazon and other regions, suggesting this legislation has failed to fend off perpetrators.
As for wildlife trafficking, penalties are light. Law 1333 of 1992 punishes illegal hunting, fishing, and capturing animals using explosives with one to three years in prison.
In Venezuela, the Organic Environmental Law of 2006 provides guidance for the management of natural resources and lays out constitutional rights to a safe, healthy, and ecologically-balanced environment for all. Articles 64 and 71 highlight a public right to access information on the environment. The state is tasked with controlling its dissemination. However, the Maduro regime has not fulfilled this function. In 2012, the government stopped publishing environmental datasets. This has made reliable data on environmental crime, deforestation, and biodiversity loss incredibly hard to come by.
The Penal Law of the Environment (Ley Penal del Ambiente) of 2012 lays out how environmental crimes in the nation should be handled. The illegal occupation of protected areas is punished by two months to one year of imprisonment. Illegal hunting faces a maximum sentence of five years and those involved in non-metallic mining, like coal or sand, in or near water sources can spend up to eight years in prison.
Gold mining, however, is not included. On the contrary, it has been promoted by the Maduro regime. In February 2016, President Nicolás Maduro created a new legal framework for mining that included the formal creation of the Orinoco Mining Arc. This has been used to boost mining activity. Despite this “legal framework,” a lack of regulation and enforcement, corrupt officials, and the power of NSAGs mean that unrestrained gold mining has fueled deforestation.
Laws designed to target environmental crime in Ecuador have been relatively lax and, in some cases, contradictory.
A landmark decision was made in 2008 to legally recognize nature as having inherent rights when the nation rewrote its constitution. This included a new chapter on the “Rights of Nature.” Articles 71 and 72 detail how nature in all its forms has the “right to exist, persist, maintain, and regenerate.” As a result of this, ecosystems themselves can be named as “defendants” in Ecuador. The new constitution, however, also permitted mining in protected areas, on special request of the president and the National Assembly’s approval.
Most environmental crimes committed in the nation are punished with relatively light penalties.
Chapter Four of the nation’s penal code provides guidelines on how to punish a wide range of environmental crimes. These include forest fires, crimes against flora and fauna, and illegal mining.
For most of these crimes, offenders are punished with one to three years in prison. Article 246 similarly punishes anyone who directly or indirectly causes fires in native forests. Article 245 lays out the same punishment for anybody who invades protected areas.
Anybody involved in the hunting, fishing, capture, collection, extraction, trafficking, possession, transport, exchange, or trade of endangered species also faces this sentence. Julia Salvador, at WCS Ecuador, revealed that, in many cases, those caught for wildlife trafficking who receive the maximum sentence of three years “get out free in a year or are not even sent to prison.”
In contrast, Guyana has a robust legal framework used to target environmental crime. Successive governments have regularly updated this as fresh challenges have emerged.
Unlike its Amazonian counterparts, Guyana is known for its strict laws and regulations when it comes to the management of natural resources. Its government has developed a green state development strategy that lays out a “green agenda” that is expected to run until 2040. The agenda will reportedly work towards a “green economy defined by sustainable, low-carbon, and resilient development that uses its resources efficiently, and is sustained over generations.”
The most important piece of legislation used to combat environmental crime in the nation is the Environmental Protection Act of 1996. This recognizes the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as the main agency tasked with handling environmental issues in Guyana. This act also provides guidelines on the management, conservation, and protection of the environment, as well as the sustainable use of natural resources.
Unlike other countries in the region, Suriname’s legal framework dances between national and departmental mechanisms. This dynamic makes it challenging to enforce laws.
When it comes to legal procedures, mining, in particular, is a problematic area for the nation.
Legal concessions are relatively easy to obtain. They are issued by the Geology and Mining Department (GMD) of the Ministry of Natural Resources. Before a concession is approved, Indigenous groups or other locals present in the affected area are supposed to be consulted. Then, a district commissioner submits non-binding advice to the ministry.
However, there is no way local people can appeal against official decisions to allocate concessions on their lands. What’s more, in practice, concessions are typically granted without a full consultation, paving the way for deforestation to occur.
Political Will and Leadership
Some clear attempts to fight environmental crime in the Amazon have been made by successive governments in our countries of study. However, the political will to fight deforestation and biodiversity loss in the region has largely been inconsistent. At times, public rhetoric and proposals have clashed with actions later taken.
In Bolivia, successive governments have promoted cattle rearing and agricultural activities as key motors for economic development. Initially, when these dynamics were first being promoted under Morales, an attempt was made to reconcile the relationship between land use and conservation. However, this rhetoric largely offset attempts to fight deforestation in the nation’s Amazon region.
After the end of Morales’ term in office, it has become commonplace to see this contradictory political messaging continue. Luis Arce, Bolivia’s current president, has promised to reactivate the country’s economy, which has been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic. Promoting agricultural activities will be at the forefront of this recovery plan.
“The current government is a continuation of that of [former President] Evo Morales,” a Bolivian journalist explained. “The expansion of the agricultural frontier to promote development in the country is a policy that will persist. It is stipulated in the National Development Plan.”
Successive governments have also continued to promote mining and the creation of mining cooperatives to facilitate economic growth. As a result, mining has been carried out in protected areas such as Madidi National Park and areas surrounding the Beni River.
Alongside this, high-level attempts to safeguard the nation’s Amazon region from illegal acts have lacked any real bite. For example, successive governments have failed to take any substantial action to curb uncontrolled fires used to make way for agricultural expansion.
In part, the lack of a political will to combat environmental crime results from the strong rapport between the governing MAS party and economic groups that benefit from agriculture and mining.
Venezuela has shown itself to be even less willing to target environmental crime in its Amazon. As in Bolivia, unrestrained mining activity is actively promoted by state officials.
During the nation’s ongoing crisis, the Maduro regime’s finances have been hit hard by US sanctions and falling oil prices. As a result, the regime has increasingly promoted gold mining to attempt to make up the difference. Rampant deforestation has been a direct result of this policy.
This will likely persist for as long as Maduro is in power. Gold is a major source of financing for the current government, the military, and NSAGs allied with it. Meanwhile, the opposition rarely brings up the environment as a topic of political interest. As such, there is no real political will to restrict the activity or reduce its impact.
Venezuela is one of just a few countries that did not submit a voluntary carbon emission reduction target as part of the 2016 Paris Climate Agreement, which aimed to foster a global response to climate change.
Environmental datasets have also been hidden from public view. There is no official data available on deforestation, endangered wildlife, or mining in Venezuela. Environmental impact studies have not been undertaken and Indigenous peoples have not been appropriately consulted as plans for mining are made.
When combined, these factors show that the political will to combat environmental crime and deforestation in Venezuela’s Amazon is largely non-existent.
In contrast, some steps have been taken in Ecuador to show the nation is taking environmental crime more seriously. The 2008 landmark decision to recognize nature as having inherent rights was a leap forward, in rhetoric at least.
However, as in Bolivia, this has been offset by the state’s ongoing promotion of industrial activities (like mining, oil exploration, and palm oil cultivation) across the nation’s Amazon. Palm oil cultivation has been linked to land grabbing in the nation’s Amazon region, while illegal miners have encroached on protected territories. It is difficult to say that the government is clamping down on environmental crime while these dynamics are at play.
This paradox looks set to continue. President Guillermo Lasso, who was sworn in on May 2021, promised to boost extractive industries during his electoral campaign.
On top of this, a lack of consistent public data available on deforestation points to a low political will to monitor and resolve environmental crimes. This correlates with the weakness of environmental institutions in the nation. A high turnover of ministers, budget cuts, and the unexplained dismissal of personnel have led to a gradual weakening of the nation’s Ministry of the Environment and Water.
When taken together, these factors show a relatively low political will to target environmental crime in Ecuador’s Amazon in any meaningful way.
In Guyana, the ongoing evolution of Guyana’s legal framework to protect the environment and its international commitment to preserve its forest indicates the country is committed to fending off environmental crime, especially illegal logging. At the same time, however, the country is in a race to exploit its mining and oil resources, which has had an impact on the degradation of its ecosystems.
Meanwhile, in Suriname, some political will to combat deforestation and its drivers moving forward is apparent. However, the results of recent promises are yet to be seen.
President Chan Santokhi, who has led the country since July 2020, has promised to better regulate the mining sector, in order to reduce its environmental impact and increase tax income.
On top of this, the current government has advocated for Indigenous rights to be considered as mining concessions are handed out.
With its plan to create a new mining department in the Ministry of Natural Resources, it seems Indigenous groups will finally have a voice in these processes. The department plans to engage with local communities and no longer grant concessions without local approval. If successful, this will be a leap forward in a country where Indigenous communities have long been ignored when concessions have been granted.
Unfortunately, according to members of local communities affected by mining, informal relationships between state officials and miners still decide who is allowed to mine legally and who is not. As such, Suriname still has some challenges to overcome when it comes to transparency around activities like mining.
However, steps are being taken in the right direction. The mining department implemented a program for concession applications to be submitted online starting in 2019, to make processes more transparent. While there is some political will to make proactive changes, the results are yet to be seen.
Multilateral Cooperation
Our countries of study largely fail to cooperate between themselves (and with other nations in the region and beyond) to tackle environmental crime in the Amazon. This is a clear area for improvement.
In Glasgow, the majority of the Amazonian countries pledged to end deforestation in under a decade. The international community promised nearly $30 billion in funding “to help unleash the potential of forests and sustainable land use.”
Despite the fanfare, there are clear shortcomings in the agreement, with Bolivia and Venezuela not signing up and the commitment of the Amazonian countries that did, especially Brazil, being called into question. Ultimately, the goal spelled out at COP26 is just that: a goal without a substantive roadmap to get there, or legislative teeth to enforce it along the way. At the regional level, similar degrees of divergence on environmental protection become clear.
Some treaties and formal alliances between Amazonian countries exist in name. The Amazon Cooperation Treaty Organization (ACTO) was established in 2002. It is made up of Brazil, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Peru, Suriname, and Venezuela. ACTO’s origins date back to 1978 when the eight countries signed the Amazon Cooperation Treaty (ACT).
The organization is currently working on a new Strategic Agenda for the 2021-2030 period. To date, it has set up different projects to strengthen institutional and civilian efforts around the management, handling, and monitoring of water and forest resources, as well as species of flora and fauna.
However, the impact of these efforts has been limited. Amazonian countries have traditionally struggled to strike a balance between environmental protection and economic development. This trend has hampered collaborative efforts to fight deforestation and environmental crime in some cases.
On top of this, ACTO lacks financial resources and faces internal difficulties. Decisionmaking is slow and projections fall short of what they set out to achieve. In this context, it should be a priority for future research to be able to contribute to the construction of a dialogue that supports cooperation with ACTO.
With ACTO struggling, the Leticia Pact was signed by Colombia, Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Brazil, Suriname, and Guyana in 2019.
The agreement seeks to strengthen coordinated action to fight deforestation in the Amazon rainforest, facilitate cooperation and the exchange of information, create an Amazonian Network for Cooperation in the face of natural disasters, and promote research and technological development to fight environmental crime and deforestation. The Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) provided funding so each signatory can set up initiatives to combat deforestation within the pact’s framework.
Finally, the Escazú Agreement, a regional treaty approved in 2018, seeks to expand access to environmental information, enhance public participation in environmental decision-making, and protect environmental activists in Latin America and the Caribbean. It is important to note that while Bolivia, Ecuador, and Guyana have ratified this agreement, Venezuela and Suriname have yet to sign it. There is no real indication that they will.
While both the Escazú Agreement and Leticia Pact mark a step in the right direction, their results are yet to be seen. For them to work effectively, each country must get on board and a number of challenges must be overcome.
Environmental expert María Antonia Tigre explained that international cooperation to protect the Amazon comes with difficulties, including “political challenges, conflicts of interests, the financial ambitions of countries, as well as biological, ethnic, and social diversities between them.” However, if environmental crime is to be combated in the Amazon, these challenges must be overcome.
Civil Society
In many cases, our countries of study have seen more effective action taken by civil society organizations than state authorities in tackling environmental crime across the Amazon.
While most state responses in Bolivia have been contradictory, civil society organizations in the nation have made focused, active attempts to combat illegal logging, mining, and wildlife trafficking in its Amazon region.
Casa Verde, a platform created by the Conservation Strategy Fund (CSF), has promoted sustainability in Bolivia by bringing local communities on board and raising awareness of the damage environmental crimes cause. The platform connects individuals and businesses with environmental organizations so they can work together on sustainability projects.
A number of civil society groups have also acted to combat wildlife trafficking in the nation. These include Bolivian Network to Combat Wildlife Trafficking (Red Boliviana de Combate al Tráfico de Animales Silvestres – RE-BOCTAS), Animal S.O.S., La Paz Municipal Zoo, Love for Animals Association (Asociación Amor por los Animales Bolivia – APLAB), the Earth Foundation, and CONTIOCAP.
To date, these initiatives have wielded greater success than national-level attempts to combat environmental crime in Bolivia.
Like in Bolivia, civil society groups play a more active role in monitoring environmental crime across Venezuela’s Amazon region than the state. Civilians, non-governmental organizations, and universities are keen to protect the rainforest, but they rely on economic support from overseas to act effectively.
SOS Orinoco, an advocacy group set up in 2018 by a group of experts inside and outside of Venezuela, has been a key player in documenting environmental crime south of the Orinoco River. It has investigated mining in the region, as well as the criminal organizations involved in it. The group has also documented the destruction mining causes to raise international awareness and make proposals to combat it.
In other cases, Indigenous communities have defended their territories as criminal organizations with an interest in mining have encroached. This resistance has put some Indigenous groups living in Venezuela’s Amazon in great danger. However, it has meant that some have been able to protect their lands from environmental crime.
Similarly, in Ecuador’s Amazon, some Indigenous communities have taken an active role in combating environmental crime. They have been pushed to do this as a result of scarce state efforts to tackle crimes, such as illegal logging.
Local communities in the region often collaborate with non-governmental organizations, which provide them with training to better patrol their territories using technology.
On the other hand, Ecuador’s Ministry of the Environment has been involved in a handful of programs that bring aboard local communities and NGOs to target environmental crime.
The ministry’s “Socio Bosque” program, launched in 2008, provided economic incentives to get communities involved in forest conservation. While it offered some promise, its impact was limited by the nation’s subsequent economic crisis.
Non-governmental organizations have also collaborated with the nation’s Ministry of the Environment. From 2014, WCS Ecuador and the Ministry of Environment started working toward the official implementation of a platform called SMART (Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool), which is used to record illegal activities in ten protected areas across Ecuador.
Prior to this, in 2001, the ministry worked with private sector groups to develop an independent forest control system. It established a control body called Green Surveillance (Vigilancia Verde), which monitored timber trade flows from forests to markets. It also introduced a body of independent forestry advisors, called Forestry Advisory (Regencia Forestal). Finally, it handed over administrative and inspection duties to the private sector.
The impact of this specific initiative was questionable, as illegal logging and timber trafficking have since continued to thrive in Ecuador. On top of this, it is important to note that these collaborative initiatives undertaken with the Ministry of Environment’s backing are still relatively rare. More often, local communities work with NGOs or come up with their own solutions to fend off environmental crime.
However, if implemented efficiently, and with the correct expertise, public-private partnerships offer great promise in tackling environmental crime across Ecuador’s Amazon.
In contrast to Bolivia, Venezuela, and Ecuador, civil society groups in Guyana are hardly involved in fighting environmental crime, as environmental education in the country is relatively low.
However, members of some Amerindian communities have fought back against those encroaching on their territories. On top of this, a handful of civil society organizations have worked with these communities to help them tackle the aftermath of environmental crime, including mercury pollution.
In Suriname, civil society groups largely perform an awareness-raising function to combat environmental crime. However, their impact in reducing such activities is limited, due to the state’s lack of interest and logistical difficulties in reaching remote zones of the nation’s interior.
Local initiatives like the “NO KWIK,” a project funded by the Environment and Mining Foundation of Suriname and Suriname Conservation Foundation, raise awareness around the impact of mining activities, sharing the dangers of mercury pollution with local communities.
Other non-governmental organizations like the Amazon Conservation Team Suriname (ACT Suriname) and the Foundation for Forest Management and Supervision (SBB) also work to raise awareness.
At an international level, the Alliance for Responsible Mining (ARM), World Wildlife Fund Guianas, the Institute of Research and Development (IRD), and the University of Quebec in Montreal (UQAM) united to work on the “Supporting Mercury Phase-out in the Guianas” project. This, too, aimed to raise awareness around the impact mercury used in mining can have on people and surrounding ecosystems.
These organizations have made great leaps in raising awareness around environmental crimes in Suriname. However, such groups can do little to fully stamp out these activities without authorities onboard.
NGOs are largely based in the nation’s capital, Paramaribo. They have limited access to the nation’s interior, where environmental crimes are being committed. Meanwhile, successive governments and state authorities have failed to curb environmental degradation themselves. This has placed an overwhelming burden on NGOs to address a large part of these crimes alone.
*Juan Diego Cárdenas, Katie Jones, Nienke Laan, Javier Lizcano, Julian Lovregio, Scott Mistler-Ferguson, Isaac Norris, and María Fernanda Ramírezcontributed to this investigation.
InSight Crime has partnered with the Igarapé Institute – an independent think tank headquartered in Brazil, that focuses on emerging development, security and climate issues – to trace the environmental crimes and criminal actors driving deforestation across the Amazon. See the investigations.
Heavy rescue – trailer wedged in underground tunnel! This job was tricky in that my rotator would not only also get stuck, but winching it forward or backward could be catastrophic. I did a similar job and had the perfect solution: let out all the air from the rear tires.
My guess is the driver was fully loaded when he entered, then when he removed the load the trailer rose high enough to where it got stuck when leaving. I carry valve stem removers specifically for tandem axles like this. In no time, I was able to deflate them so he can safely drive out of the tunnel.
Because he had to drive several hundred feet to safety, the tires came off the rims which I figured would happen. McGyver to the rescue yet again, as he brought his service truck to get everything back up and running in minutes!
►All footage was shot with my GoPro Hero 9. My company logo and intro/outro graphics were created by https://www.instagram.com/sa.creations/
►I purchase my rigging equipment from: https://baileystowinginc.com/main.sc
► The wireless headsets that I use on all my rotators:
https://setcomcorp.com/industrial-multi-user-wireless-intercom-headset-system.html
► Buy your own Guardian Angel Device just like mine here!
Es sind alle Augen auf sie gerichtet! Das einstige Traumtrio bestehend aus William, Kate und Harry ist nach einem Jahr des Abstandes wieder miteinander vereint.
